Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Maine Jobs Council

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 842687765
ME · NTEE S01
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Joe Edwards, Executive Director / CEO ($60,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 47th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Joe Edwards — reported title “CHAIRMAN/TREASURER”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,998 total compensation of comparable organizations → $152,344 $60,000
$11,62210th
$21,75625th
$68,388Median
$84,93275th
$105,93990th
$60,000This org · 47th
p10$11,622
p25$21,756
p50$68,388
p75$84,932
p90$105,939
$60,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to ME cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Bienvenido In Action TX$345,101 President $2,000 $1,998 2024
Coalition Of African Communities - Philadelphia Africom PA$302,432 Director Of Programs $26,451 $26,342 2024
San Francisco Transit Riders CA$356,416 Executive Director $18,598 $16,038 2024
Ruby M Sisson Memorial Library CO$360,662 Executive Di $52,655 $50,422 2024
Friends Of Lafitte Corridor Inc LA$370,942 Executive Dir. $95,135 $104,616 2024
Pennsylvania State Association Of PA$384,303 Pres. 10/23- $3,000 $2,988 2024
Visiones Collaborativas Collaborative Visions NM$246,616 Executive Director $11,970 $13,780 2022
Spokane Alliance WA$240,872 Senior Organizer & Executive Director $86,534 $75,376 2025
The Urbanist WA$240,593 Publisher $76,487 $68,388 2024
Socorro County Options Prevention NM$422,804 Coordinator/ $40,740 $43,759 2024
Connectree CA$233,490 President $83,700 $72,178 2024
The Neighborhood Network Alliance IL$425,227 Executive Dir. $110,043 $111,231 2023
Drive Forward WA$230,000 Executive Director $100,000 $89,411 2024
Pittsburgh Interfaith Impact Network PA$228,204 Board Member $17,240 $17,169 2024
Peer Voices United CA$430,066 Ceo $101,764 $87,756 2024
Aapi Women Lead CA$438,369 Executive Dir. $176,663 $152,344 2024
Builders Of Color Coalition MA$439,464 Executive Director $86,417 $77,552 2024
Both Sides Of The Conversation CA$446,139 Executive Dir. $51,000 $45,278 2023
Realtors Political Action Committee Ii MI$489,038 Treasurer/secretary $79,655 $82,107 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to ME cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to ME cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default47th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)47th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted58th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted47th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Joe Edwards) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (S01), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $60,000 is reasonable (approximately the 47th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.