Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Tanwir

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 850979202
VA · NTEE X40
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Omar Popal, Executive Director / CEO ($24,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 21 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 14th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Omar Popal — reported title “PRESIDENT”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

21 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 21 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$13,864 total compensation of comparable organizations → $95,994 $24,000
$21,49410th
$33,05625th
$41,306Median
$58,85875th
$68,16690th
$24,000This org · 14th
p10$21,494
p25$33,056
p50$41,306
p75$58,858
p90$68,166
$24,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to VA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Muna Center Of South Florida Inc FL$260,357 President $33,000 $33,056 2023
Marvelous Quran CA$228,642 Cfo $60,000 $55,244 2023
Sanad Trust Foundation-new FL$273,199 President & Ceo $47,350 $46,069 2024
Ihsan Initiatives Nfp IL$221,609 President $40,000 $40,728 2024
Suhbah Foundation TX$221,038 Director $35,000 $37,332 2023
Center For Dawah And Research Center Inc MI$216,411 Imam $26,300 $28,115 2024
Dar Omar Al-farooq MN$213,295 Executive Director $20,400 $21,494 2023
Imam Abu Hanifa Islamic Center AZ$291,353 President $31,200 $31,077 2024
Masjid Al-shuhada CO$291,867 Director $20,025 $20,474 2023
Measured Tones Institute Of Quran TN$206,890 Executive Director $41,266 $44,924 2024
Ummul Qura Islamic Foundation TX$295,853 Principal/director $60,000 $62,160 2024
South Florida Muslim Federation Inc FL$200,527 Program Coordinator $38,308 $38,373 2023
Hatfield Jame Masjid PA$193,460 Imam $66,000 $68,166 2024
Al-huda Islamic Center Of Nashville TN$306,717 Director $54,000 $58,787 2024
Sapience Education TX$310,485 Director $90,000 $95,994 2023
Knowman Learning Academy OH$328,983 President $12,276 $13,864 2023
Markaz Tawheed Wa Sunnah NC$341,396 Vice Chairman $56,400 $60,356 2024
Ihya Foundation TX$347,795 Director $35,000 $37,332 2023
American Islamic Outreach NC$348,352 Ceo $55,000 $58,858 2024
Center Dc DC$353,954 Executive Director $45,449 $41,306 2024
Mufid Academic Seminary VA$364,008 President $69,798 $69,798 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to VA cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to VA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default14th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)14th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted19th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted14th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Omar Popal) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 21 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (X40), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $24,000 is reasonable (approximately the 14th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.