Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

We The Patriots Usa Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 852165507
ID · NTEE R60
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Dawn Jolly, Executive Director / CEO ($150,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 83rd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Dawn Jolly — reported title “President”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$10,959 total compensation of comparable organizations → $188,812 $150,000
$12,98510th
$33,71225th
$70,727Median
$119,53175th
$160,36890th
$150,000This org · 83rd
p10$12,985
p25$33,712
p50$70,727
p75$119,531
p90$160,368
$150,000

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to ID cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Ceasefire Pennsylvania PA$322,328 Executive Di $11,954 $11,537 2023
The National Center For Law And Policy CA$299,784 President $219,646 $183,558 2023
Zachor Legal Institute MT$324,448 President $30,000 $30,399 2024
Knife Rights Inc AZ$296,945 Chairman/ceo $15,050 $13,606 2024
Texans For Vaccine Choice Education TX$292,608 Secretary $72,583 $68,252 2024
Missouri Civil Justice Reform MO$284,500 Executive Dir. $120,000 $123,006 2023
Mi Patria Pr PR$270,393 Co-chair & Treasurer $11,249 $10,959 2025
Public Accountability OR$269,630 Secretaryexecutive Director $50,000 $43,649 2024
Center For Justice And Democracy NY$269,313 President $150,000 $127,416 2024
North Carolina Coalition For Alternatives To The D NC$249,509 Executive Director $80,600 $78,287 2024
Constitutional Rights Foundation Of CA$379,628 Executive Director $64,266 $52,166 2024
National Council On Civil Advocacy Inc DC$389,315 Executive Officer $86,194 $73,202 2023
Fpc Action Foundation NV$407,462 Vp/gc Thru 3/24, President From 3/24 $200,380 $188,812 2024
Florida Impact Inc FL$414,959 President/ce $92,240 $83,863 2023
Advocates For Trans Equality NY$424,852 Executive Director $21,038 $17,871 2024
National Whistleblower Center DC$439,947 Executive Dir. $182,358 $150,429 2024
Maryland Rise Inc MD$448,800 Former Executive Director $52,272 $47,296 2023
National Center For Justice And Liberty IL$466,432 President $118,059 $109,106 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to ID cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to ID cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default83rd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)78th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted89th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted78th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Dawn Jolly) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (R60), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $150,000 is reasonable (approximately the 83rd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.