Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Admin Hub

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 852631982
CA · NTEE T30
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Brook Maturo, Executive Director / CEO ($72,996) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 20 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 65th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

20 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 20 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$3,000 total compensation of comparable organizations → $175,000 $72,996
$22,66910th
$46,62325th
$69,638Median
$87,11675th
$110,04290th
$72,996This org · 65th
p10$22,669
p25$46,623
p50$69,638
p75$87,116
p90$110,042
$72,996

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Sunsar Maya IncCA $270,320$70,000 990
The Flagstone Initiative IncCA $283,828$175,000 990
Peace For The PersecutedCA $296,669$3,000 990
Biletnikoff FoundationCA $244,689$71,391 990
The Blessing Center IncCA $306,191$34,967 990
Velocity Entrepreneurial DriveCA $239,741$110,000 990
Full Circle FundCA $232,350$54,687 990
Creating Caring CommunitiesCA $229,516$22,294 990
The Dominguez Dream In Memory OfCA $317,313$68,963 990
Shane Mcconkey FoundationCA $220,153$48,566 990
Wounded Heroes Of AmericaCA $214,144$72,848 990
De Marchena-huyke FoundationCA $208,537$22,711 990
Gay For GoodCA $348,240$83,778 990
Million KidsCA $197,798$40,795 990
Equality And Inclusion In Hospitality IncCA $196,022$97,131 990
Youth Business Alliance IncCA $366,781$99,163 990
Cast HopeCA $387,121$80,133 990
Merlin's Magic Wand FoundationCA $398,879$69,276 990
The Dragon Kim FoundationCA $399,009$110,418 990
Riverside County Physicians MemorialCA $400,463$48,700 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default65th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)55th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted65th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted60th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Brook Maturo) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 20 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (T30) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $72,996 is reasonable (approximately the 65th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.