Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Rochester Ecology Partners Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 853700682
NY · NTEE C01
FY ending 2024-09-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Chris Widmaier, Executive Director / CEO ($59,112) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 58 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 24th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

How comparable organizations were selected

58 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 58 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,371 total compensation of comparable organizations → $487,771 $59,112
$27,12210th
$63,88525th
$94,929Median
$115,05175th
$158,69390th
$59,112This org · 24th
p10$27,122
p25$63,885
p50$94,929
p75$115,051
p90$158,693
$59,112

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NY cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Snake River Waterkeeper IncID $444,677$487,771 990
Bluedot Institute IncCA $445,571$71,394 990
Roaring Fork Valley Wildfire CollaborativeCO $448,807$95,503 990
Western Leaders NetworkCO $432,415$116,782 990
Powder River Basin Resource CouncilWY $463,151$49,229 990
Brighter Green IncNY $463,273$36,034 990
Minnesota Environmental PartnershipMN $464,205$168,430 990
Urban Water Institute IncCA $418,696$46,279 990
California Urban Forests CouncilCA $470,825$113,556 990
Cape Fear River WatchNC $471,332$78,733 990
Great Rivers Habitat AllianceMO $415,631$182,709 990
Environmental Justice Community Action NetworkNC $475,260$108,629 990
San Francisco Bicycle CoalitionCA $413,193$156,000 990
Recycling Association Of MinnesotaMN $477,798$55,466 990
Yaak Valley Forest CouncilMT $410,680$20,074 990
Grace Hudowalski Charitable TrustME $407,041$61,607 990
Everglades Law Center IncFL $483,835$94,873 990
Arkansas Environmental Federation IncAR $402,813$124,934 990
North Carolina Climate JusticeNC $485,773$56,700 990
Maine Climate Action NowME $485,922$70,719 990
Energy Policy NetworkTX $490,332$22,936 990
Childhood Lead Action ProjectRI $394,175$73,505 990
East Michigan Environmental ActionMI $499,608$110,565 990
Intersectional EnvironmentalistCA $508,909$17,158 990
Alabama Rivers Alliance IncAL $521,285$83,700 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NY cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default24th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)26th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted24th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted21st

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Chris Widmaier) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 58 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (C01), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $59,112 is reasonable (approximately the 24th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.