Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Economic Collaborative Of N Arizona

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 860699786
AZ · NTEE S300
FY ending 2025-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Gail Jackson, Executive Director / CEO ($107,635) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 131 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 83rd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

131 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 131 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$2,426 total compensation of comparable organizations → $228,814 $107,635
$17,27910th
$40,14225th
$72,608Median
$96,58675th
$124,89390th
$107,635This org · 83rd
p10$17,279
p25$40,142
p50$72,608
p75$96,586
p90$124,893
$107,635

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to AZ cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
Agile City Winston-salemNC $246,249$185,962 990
Milestone Growth Capital InstituteMI $244,356$40,155 990
Everett Station District AllianceWA $244,137$47,219 990
Economic Development Corporation OfIL $243,161$83,944 990
The Space On MainVT $251,549$84,056 990
So Cal Corporate Growth PartnersCA $241,473$83,109 990
Southwest Michigan Regional ChamberMI $241,122$5,330 990
Southside First EconomicTX $240,099$31,601 990
Yuma Multiversity Campus CorporationAZ $238,751$121,916 990
World Trade Center AssociationCA $237,400$37,042 990
Parnassah Network IncNJ $236,955$17,660 990
Economic Development Professionals AssociationSD $236,950$2,426 990
Santa Cruz WorksCA $236,447$77,417 990
Creative Portland CorporationME $236,053$34,032 990
St Mary's County CommunityMD $234,480$49,892 990
West Bloomington Revitalization ProjectIL $259,902$19,511 990
Sector67 IncWI $233,249$41,313 990
South CentralLA $261,321$101,705 990
Naugatuck Valley Project IncCT $263,743$70,051 990
Johnson County Economic Development CorpMO $229,565$100,505 990
Business & Education Network IncKY $227,365$15,463 990
Noble County Convention And VisitorIN $267,279$64,475 990
Downtown Excelsior Partnership IncMO $267,348$99,656 990
Rhea Economic And Tourism CouncilTN $268,307$57,518 990
Building 127 Ll IncNY $268,876$95,707 990

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to AZ cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default83rd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)86th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted85th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted71st

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Gail Jackson) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 131 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (S30), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $107,635 is reasonable (approximately the 83rd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.