Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Arthouse Studio Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 861773041
CA · NTEE A25
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Julie Stover, Executive Director / CEO ($113,300) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 20 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 85th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Julie Stover — reported title “Executive Dir.”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

20 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 20 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$5,845 total compensation of comparable organizations → $144,794 $113,300
$13,03210th
$37,36125th
$73,270Median
$97,87575th
$121,95790th
$113,300This org · 85th
p10$13,032
p25$37,361
p50$73,270
p75$97,875
p90$121,957
$113,300

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Bloom Arts Foundation Inc CA$481,207 Ececutive Director $104,137 $104,137 2024
Creative Kids Playhouse Childrens CA$476,911 President $37,015 $38,108 2023
Hijos Del Sol Arts Productions CA$506,580 Executive Director $95,271 $95,271 2024
Fashioneer Org CA$510,314 Director $30,000 $30,000 2024
Youth Arts Collective Inc CA$444,083 Director $65,000 $66,920 2023
Truckee Roundhouse CA$542,183 Executive Dir. $95,787 $95,787 2024
Aspire Creative Arts Program CA$394,076 President $13,033 $13,418 2023
Playground CA$584,541 President $120,000 $120,000 2024
Foothill Creative Arts Group CA$585,498 Exective Director $71,875 $73,998 2023
Oasis Companies International CA$593,151 Executive Dir. $109,002 $112,222 2023
Art House San Clemente CA$373,922 Executive Director $79,995 $82,358 2023
California State Band Championships CA$361,770 President $6,000 $5,845 2025
Top Billing Entertainment Performance CA$620,342 Executive Dir. $43,000 $44,270 2023
Thru Guidance Ministries Inc CA$355,744 Executive Director $139,571 $139,571 2024
Community Rejuvenation Project Inc CA$355,178 President & Ceo $70,460 $72,541 2023
Peninsula Youth Orchestra CA$633,618 President $140,640 $144,794 2023
Nw Film Camp CA$340,757 President $9,562 $9,562 2024
San Francisco Youth Theatre CA$672,198 Executive Director $70,000 $70,000 2024
Notes For Education Inc CA$696,797 President $35,119 $35,119 2024
Arts Education Connection San Diego CA$717,642 Executive Director $82,984 $82,984 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default85th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)85th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted85th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted85th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Julie Stover) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 20 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (A25) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $113,300 is reasonable (approximately the 85th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.