Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Menddigap Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 881454249
NY · NTEE A23
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Staceyann Chin, Executive Director / CEO ($5,230) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 19 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 0th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Staceyann Chin — reported title “President & Director”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

19 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 19 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$5,536 total compensation of comparable organizations → $101,825 $5,230
$6,27610th
$12,72825th
$42,252Median
$66,13075th
$75,53590th
$5,230This org · 0th
p10$6,276
p25$12,728
p50$42,252
p75$66,130
p90$75,535
$5,230

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to NY cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Harambee Kingston Ny NY$249,748 Ceo/executive Director $75,824 $73,649 2024
African American Cultural Center NY$244,009 President $6,000 $6,000 2023
Niagara Celtic Heritage Society Inc NY$224,921 Festival Dir $5,700 $5,536 2024
Creative China Center Inc NY$220,119 President $12,000 $11,656 2024
Chinese Center On Long Island Inc NY$219,451 Director $6,532 $6,345 2024
The Avenue Blackbox Inc NY$218,958 Ceo $64,267 $64,267 2023
Sicc Inc NY$216,722 Executive Director $43,500 $42,252 2024
Descendants Of Holocaust Survivors NY$279,204 Executive Director $74,946 $72,796 2024
Six Nations Iroquois Cultural NY$187,701 Treasurer $13,800 $13,800 2023
Ceny Centro Educativo Inc NY$184,251 Secretary $12,000 $11,656 2024
Global Alliance Of Indigenous Peoples Gender Justi NY$312,058 Director $58,000 $58,000 2023
Young Indian Culture Group Inc NY$181,746 President $21,750 $21,126 2024
Kyoungs Pacific Beat Inc NY$324,992 Executive Dir. $40,000 $40,000 2023
Extend NY$328,827 Director $85,533 $83,079 2024
Mexico Beyond Mariachi Inc NY$330,935 Ceo/executive Director $19,757 $18,696 2025
Welsh North American Association Inc NY$345,937 Executive Secr. $50,575 $49,124 2024
Arteeast Inc NY$347,495 Executive Director $70,000 $67,992 2024
Exhibit J Inc NY$366,615 Director $101,825 $101,825 2023
Greek America Cultural And NY$367,037 President $44,000 $44,000 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to NY cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to NY cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default0th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)0th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted0th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Staceyann Chin) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 19 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (A23) + NY + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $5,230 is reasonable (approximately the 0th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.