Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Wyoming Donor Alliance

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 882031141
WY · NTEE W24
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Nicole Kaufman, Executive Director / CEO ($27,920) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 22nd percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Nicole Kaufman — reported title “EXECUTIVE DI”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$3,234 total compensation of comparable organizations → $118,926 $27,920
$19,51810th
$31,88925th
$63,537Median
$91,00375th
$98,14790th
$27,920This org · 22nd
p10$19,518
p25$31,889
p50$63,537
p75$91,003
p90$98,147
$27,920

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to WY cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Committee For A Unified Independent NY$290,721 President & Ceo $145,093 $118,926 2024
Fundacion Agenda Ciudadana Inc PR$287,314 Treasurer $22,221 $22,221 2023
Taxpayer Foundation Of Oregon OR$321,399 Executive Director $113,450 $98,388 2023
Ventura County Regional Defense Partnership CA$274,910 Co-chair Public Member $50,400 $38,459 2025
Good Knights Inc OH$322,579 Executive Director $13,750 $13,211 2024
Bikewalk North Carolina NC$329,878 Executive Di $65,250 $59,579 2025
C4c Oakland Action Inc CA$261,369 Org. Director $37,917 $29,699 2024
Coalition For Open Democracy NH$258,105 Excutive Director $60,414 $52,095 2023
Free State Project Inc NH$256,959 Executive Director $3,750 $3,234 2023
The Rendell Center For Civics And PA$356,748 Executive Director $105,278 $98,044 2023
Rhode Island Center For Freedom And Prosperity Inc RI$229,988 Executive Director $86,500 $77,458 2023
Minnesota Voters Alliance MN$367,012 Executive Director $108,805 $97,520 2024
Better Wyoming WY$373,140 Executive Di $67,494 $67,494 2023
Yuan Foundation MD$223,028 Chief Executive Officer $89,804 $76,157 2024
Caesar Rodney Institute DE$375,428 Executive Director $52,000 $47,549 2023
Nm Voters First NM$213,100 Executive Director $24,000 $23,414 2024
True Texas Education Corporation TX$393,945 Director $100,000 $90,736 2024
Fairvote Minnesota Foundation MN$397,347 Executive Director $101,632 $91,092 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to WY cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to WY cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default22nd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)22nd
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted22nd
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted22nd

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Nicole Kaufman) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (W24), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $27,920 is reasonable (approximately the 22nd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.