Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Ontario-montclair Schools Foundation

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 900716973
CA · NTEE B11
FY ending 2023-06-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Felix Melendez, Executive Director / CEO ($46,396) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 50th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Felix Melendez — reported title “OMSF DIRECTOR”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$6,813 total compensation of comparable organizations → $600,310 $46,396
$24,10810th
$29,35425th
$44,317Median
$58,50475th
$97,17490th
$46,396This org · 50th
p10$24,108
p25$29,354
p50$44,317
p75$58,504
p90$97,174
$46,396

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Santiago Canyon College Foundation CA$246,541 Interim Executive Director (April '23-jun '23) $59,204 $59,204 2023
Santa Clara City Library CA$246,620 Executive Dir. $95,968 $93,215 2024
Cencal Youth Sports CA$219,561 Executive Director $24,400 $23,700 2024
City Of Orange Public Library Foundation CA$218,507 Executive Director $42,000 $40,795 2024
Rudolph And Florence Nadbath CA$289,684 Trustee $25,815 $25,074 2024
Microenterprise Collaborative CA$187,555 Executive Dir. $106,411 $106,411 2023
Cal State University Fullerton CA$307,284 Director $56,403 $56,403 2023
Chico Cheer All Stars Inc CA$184,735 Director And President $30,000 $29,139 2024
Luis & Linda Nieves Family Foundation CA$314,060 University Director $600,310 $600,310 2023
East Side Union High School District CA$315,403 Executive Dir. $25,000 $24,283 2024
Friends Of Upland Choral Music CA$172,068 Treasurer $7,200 $6,813 2025
Riverside County Office Of CA$324,521 Director $75,947 $73,768 2024
University Of Northern California CA$165,491 President $30,000 $30,000 2023
Santa Rosa Academy Foundation CA$165,173 President $53,021 $51,500 2024
K-love & Air1 Foundation CA$328,960 Ceo/director (Ended 5/15/24) $48,455 $47,065 2024
Whitecaps Baseball Academy CA$333,957 President $42,797 $41,569 2024
El Sol Academy Foundation CA$345,291 Exec. Dir. Of El Sol Academy $48,053 $48,053 2023
Charter Facilities Support Corp CA$353,153 Ceo $36,704 $36,704 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default50th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)50th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted0th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted67th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Felix Melendez) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (B11) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $46,396 is reasonable (approximately the 50th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.