Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Allegiance Home Care Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 931855292
SC · NTEE E92
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of April Jackson, Executive Director / CEO ($31,801) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 17th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: April Jackson — reported title “PRESIDENT”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,704 total compensation of comparable organizations → $169,825 $31,801
$19,23510th
$39,23225th
$57,923Median
$67,77575th
$106,61690th
$31,801This org · 17th
p10$19,235
p25$39,232
p50$57,923
p75$67,775
p90$106,616
$31,801

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to SC cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
At Home In Alexandria VA$213,675 Executive Director $55,508 $51,374 2024
Sleepy Eye Area Home Health Inc MN$212,016 President $179,300 $169,825 2024
Samaritan Caregivers Inc IN$233,959 Executive Dire $64,030 $66,636 2023
Mesh Life Care At Home Inc MD$208,854 Administrator $4,172 $3,849 2023
Memorial Medical Care Pc NY$239,752 President $76,428 $68,155 2023
East Side Elders MN$203,830 Executive Director $70,000 $71,057 2022
Owatonna Healthy Seniors Program MN$203,567 Key Employee $65,640 $62,171 2024
Comoconnects MN$200,698 Executive Dir. $58,123 $55,051 2024
Prime Care Inc NJ$250,859 Executive Director $37,983 $32,507 2024
Southeast Seniors A Living At Homeblock Nurse Program MN$260,194 Executive Director $69,225 $65,567 2024
Morning Light Foundation Inc GA$285,245 Administrator $139,300 $134,258 2024
Ahrc Home Care Services Inc NY$287,720 Ceo, Nysarc Inc., Nyc Chap $42,201 $37,633 2023
Lake Sunapee Region Visiting Nurse NH$294,478 President & Ceo $29,182 $25,829 2024
Empath Home Health Division Inc FL$309,635 President/ceo $48,894 $44,028 2024
Asbury Communities Hcbs Inc MD$313,389 Executive Director $1,902 $1,704 2024
Paynesville Area Living At Home Block Nurse Program MN$313,668 Program & Marketing Director $49,808 $45,960 2025
The Loving Care Hospice Inc OH$315,102 Chief Executive Officer $59,881 $60,794 2024
Faith And Care Home Health Agency Inc TX$321,022 Muse $96,000 $94,769 2023

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to SC cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to SC cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default17th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)17th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted50th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted0th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (April Jackson) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (E92), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $31,801 is reasonable (approximately the 17th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.