Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Consult Atlas Foundation

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 934435012
AZ · NTEE E02
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Piyush Agnihotri, Executive Director / CEO ($8,931) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 17 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 6th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Piyush Agnihotri — reported title “Chief Legal Officer”, selected as the organization's highest-paid individual — no exact title match, so confirm this is a comparable role.

How comparable organizations were selected

17 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 17 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$8,225 total compensation of comparable organizations → $286,769 $8,931
$38,57010th
$57,85525th
$66,718Median
$90,25875th
$144,46090th
$8,931This org · 6th
p10$38,570
p25$57,855
p50$66,718
p75$90,258
p90$144,460
$8,931

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to AZ cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Independent Health Network Inc NE$449,119 President & Ceo $39,542 $45,529 2023
Region Vii Complete Community Care MI$406,024 Executive Director $35,488 $38,087 2024
Commission For The Accreditation Of PA$394,041 Executive Director $60,000 $62,215 2024
504healthnet Inc LA$471,394 Interim Executive Director $78,831 $90,258 2024
Council On Aging Of Florida Inc FL$480,135 Executive Director $293,577 $286,769 2024
North Carolina Pace Association NC$491,764 Executive Director $67,000 $70,129 2025
L A Net Community Health Resource Network CA$495,036 President Nonvoting $72,175 $66,718 2023
Healthcare Ventures Alliance Llc PA$513,691 Dir Of Clinical Svcs Integ $160,556 $166,484 2024
Connectmed International CA$347,337 Executive Dir. $82,800 $74,344 2024
Walking Miraclesorg WV$344,078 Chair $54,250 $61,077 2024
Health Tech Alley MD$338,615 President/executive Director $105,000 $105,087 2023
Detroit East Medical Control MI$334,262 Secretary/treasurer $120,920 $129,777 2024
Cch Management Corporation CA$311,667 President & Ceo (Thru Sept 2022) $42,073 $38,892 2023
International Psychotherapy Institute MD$610,659 Executive Director $57,808 $57,855 2023
Connections Telehealth Consortium ME$628,009 President $7,900 $8,225 2024
Behavior Change Consulting Institute FL$639,001 Executive Director $59,650 $59,988 2023
Vail Health Services CO$644,463 President And Ceo $76,146 $75,921 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to AZ cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to AZ cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default6th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)6th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted29th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted0th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Piyush Agnihotri) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 17 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (E02), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $8,931 is reasonable (approximately the 6th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.