Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Lend A Hand Foundation

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 943293372
CA · NTEE P99
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Dee Johnson, Executive Director / CEO ($62,330) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 20 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 25th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Dee Johnson — reported title “Executive Dir.”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

20 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 20 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$3,125 total compensation of comparable organizations → $167,361 $62,330
$20,86510th
$55,64025th
$70,095Median
$86,85375th
$103,00090th
$62,330This org · 25th
p10$20,865
p25$55,640
p50$70,095
p75$86,853
p90$103,000
$62,330

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Order Our Steps CA$479,696 Owner $80,000 $82,363 2023
A Touch Of Understanding CA$461,630 Executive Dire $63,407 $65,280 2023
Stand In Peace International CA$459,834 Ceo $93,000 $95,747 2023
The Unforgettables Foundation CA$452,164 President & Ceo $84,072 $84,072 2024
Faith In Action Interfaith Volunteer Caregivers Of Solano County CA$516,263 Executive Director $92,466 $95,197 2023
Stronger Together Now CA$430,751 Chief Executive Office $66,954 $66,954 2024
Noble Path Foundation Inc CA$415,387 Treasurer $7,115 $7,115 2024
San Pedro Recovery Alliance CA$407,250 Executive Director $71,021 $71,021 2024
Awareness Into Domestic Abuse CA$405,838 Executive Director $3,125 $3,125 2024
Kitka Inc CA$390,469 Ex Dir Trustee Kitka Member $82,741 $82,741 2024
The Laundry Truck La CA$560,749 Director $33,120 $33,120 2024
The Alabaster Jar Project CA$577,822 Former Executive Director $70,139 $68,331 2025
Nick & Normas No Child Left Behind Fund CA$595,319 Board President $22,393 $22,393 2024
Fox Vocational Services CA$601,026 Executive Director $171,789 $167,361 2025
Dream Catchers Edh CA$602,535 Ceo $115,000 $115,000 2024
Workable Career Trends CA$341,514 Ceo $98,750 $101,667 2023
Nate's Place A Wellness And CA$620,044 President $27,000 $27,000 2024
Earthlodge Center For Transformation CA$640,226 Member $61,334 $63,146 2023
Jfs Foundation CA$678,330 Treasurer $67,184 $69,168 2023
Advance Oc CA$684,638 Director Of Strategic Partnerships $80,000 $80,000 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default25th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)30th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted30th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted25th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Dee Johnson) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 20 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (P99) + CA + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $62,330 is reasonable (approximately the 25th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.