Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Nautilus Of America Inc

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 953608292
CA · NTEE Q050
FY ending 2023-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Peter Hayes, Executive Director / CEO ($133,007) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 18 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 72nd percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

Benchmarked executive: Peter Hayes — reported title “Executive Dir.”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

18 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 18 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$11,996 total compensation of comparable organizations → $283,295 $133,007
$13,05410th
$36,60325th
$93,736Median
$137,62575th
$161,19890th
$133,007This org · 72nd
p10$13,054
p25$36,603
p50$93,736
p75$137,625
p90$161,198
$133,007

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Armenian National Institute Inc DC$255,188 Director $31,693 $32,208 2023
World Affairs Council Of Arizona Inc AZ$238,456 Executive Director $81,003 $90,217 2023
Institute For Food And Development Policy Inc CA$269,887 Executive Director - Until 05/22/2023 $146,731 $146,731 2023
Policy And Economic Research NC$230,371 President $66,875 $80,023 2023
Global Development Network Inc VA$285,999 President Until December 2022 $10,728 $11,996 2023
Middle East Policy Council DC$286,336 Executive Director $160,000 $162,599 2023
Integrative Strategies Forum Inc MD$196,907 Executive Director $91,659 $99,238 2023
Amazon Center For Environmental PA$304,861 President $12,000 $13,461 2024
Carey Institute For Global Good Inc NY$193,593 President $11,567 $12,105 2023
Americans For A Safe Israel Inc NY$189,141 Director $95,680 $97,254 2024
Intelligence And National Security VA$184,109 President $45,841 $49,788 2024
World Affairs Council Of New Hampshire NH$321,406 Executive Director $97,060 $103,789 2023
Reinventing Bretton Woods Foundation NY$322,194 President & Executive Director $158,000 $160,598 2024
Lumen Inc VA$177,837 Director $19,140 $21,402 2023
Coalition For Integrity Inc DC$172,861 President & Ceo $287,000 $283,295 2024
The World Affairs Council Of San Antonio TX$330,189 Executive Director $113,979 $128,249 2024
Development Data Lab Inc DC$360,545 Executive Director $138,500 $140,750 2023
The 1990 Institute CA$374,677 Executive Director $73,365 $71,260 2024

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to CA cost of living and 2023 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default72nd
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)72nd
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted72nd
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted56th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Peter Hayes) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 18 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (Q05), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $133,007 is reasonable (approximately the 72nd percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.