Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download PDF — $49
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

California Manufacturing Technology

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 954491123
CA · NTEE S43
FY ending 2024-09-30
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of James Watson, Executive Director / CEO ($481,536) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 163 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 75th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range

How comparable organizations were selected

163 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 163 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$9,607 total compensation of comparable organizations → $1,105,336 $481,536
$104,48910th
$182,50125th
$266,029Median
$468,24475th
$702,03190th
$481,536This org · 75th
p10$104,489
p25$182,501
p50$266,029
p75$468,244
p90$702,031
$481,536

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to CA cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateTotal revenueTotal compSource
National Board Of Certification And Recertification For Nurse AnesthetistsIL $20,766,402$518,820 990
Ohio Community Development Finance FundOH $20,728,998$730,404 990
Pennyrile Allied Community Services IncKY $20,861,138$204,085 990
Western Dairyland EconomicWI $20,655,375$181,804 990
Scrum Alliance IncCO $20,870,461$877,147 990
🔒 158 more comparable organizations — included in the purchased report

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to CA cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default75th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)79th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted75th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted68th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Ready-to-adopt board minutes — executive compensation

🔒 The complete minutes language — three numbered resolutions pre-filled with this organization, the 163-organization comparison, the date, and the percentile finding, ready to paste into your minutes — is included in the purchased report.

Unlock the board report — $49

Running reports for this organization all year? Annual Org Pass — $99/yr.

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.