Executive Director / CEO
This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Kamila Giesbrecht, Executive Director / CEO ($224,000) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 10 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.
Compensation sits at approximately the 50th percentile of comparable organizationswithin the typical range
Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations); the reported amount is on each linked 990.
| Organization | State | Total revenue | Total comp | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Brotherhood Of Trade | NY | $207,214,422 | $305,493 | 990 |
| St Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association | MN | $203,381,680 | $146,046 | 990 |
| Kauai Island Utility Cooperative | HI | $191,634,829 | $893,076 | 990 |
| Southern California Pipe Trades | CA | $190,107,098 | $48,443 | 990 |
| Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc | AZ | $189,995,960 | $846,251 | 990 |
| 🔒 5 more comparable organizations — included in the purchased report | ||||
Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.
Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:
| Basis | Subject percentile |
|---|---|
| Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default | 50th |
| Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments) | 50th |
| Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted | 60th |
| All sources (D + E + F), adjusted | 30th |
If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.
Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:
Ready-to-adopt board minutes — executive compensation
🔒 The complete minutes language — three numbered resolutions pre-filled with this organization, the 10-organization comparison, the date, and the percentile finding, ready to paste into your minutes — is included in the purchased report.
Unlock the board report — $49Running reports for this organization all year? Annual Org Pass — $99/yr.
Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.