Live preview — download the board-ready PDF to attach to your minutes.Download the free PDF
Email yourself a copy:
PeerBasis
Compensation Comparability Determination

Richmond Athletics

Executive Director / CEO

EIN 991316345
TX · NTEE N67
FY ending 2024-12-31
June 9, 2026

This analysis benchmarks the total compensation of Linda Chang, Executive Director / CEO ($12,115) against every comparable organization that fit the selection criteria — 78 in total — drawn systematically from IRS Form 990 filings, not a hand-picked subset.

Compensation sits at approximately the 15th percentile of comparable organizationsbelow the typical range for comparable organizations

Benchmarked executive: Linda Chang — reported title “President”, a direct title match to the Executive Director / CEO role.

How comparable organizations were selected

78 organizations qualified on sector, size, and geography 78 within the band form the benchmarked peer set.

Distribution of comparable compensation

$1,102 total compensation of comparable organizations → $115,757 $12,115
$10,24810th
$21,73225th
$37,181Median
$59,91375th
$70,55090th
$12,115This org · 15th
p10$10,248
p25$21,732
p50$37,181
p75$59,913
p90$70,550
$12,115

Comparable organizations

Each figure is Form 990 Part VII columns D + F (reportable pay plus other compensation and benefits; column F may include amounts from related organizations), normalized to TX cost of living (BEA RPP, 2023) and to its filing year (CPI-U); the reported amount is on each linked 990.

OrganizationStateRevenueMatched titleComp
(reported)
Comp
(adjusted)
FY
Jackson Aquatic Club Inc MS$216,580 Executive Di $69,951 $77,884 2024
South Orlando Rowing Association FL$217,632 Board Member $33,000 $30,991 2024
Sea Scope Incorporated IN$217,748 Ceo $29,264 $31,762 2023
Surfers For Autism Ii Inc FL$219,343 Officer-president $25,000 $24,171 2023
Lodi City Swim Club CA$211,195 President $58,409 $50,421 2024
Atomic City Aquatic Club TN$221,438 Executive Directorcoach $45,009 $47,296 2024
Us Swimming-missouri Valley KS$222,473 Executive Director $64,900 $70,092 2024
Central Jersey Aquatic Club Inc NJ$222,728 Treasurer $19,702 $17,585 2024
Swim Focus CA$208,635 Ceo $81,000 $69,922 2024
Hummelstown Swim Club PA$208,566 President $6,000 $6,158 2023
Honolulu Water Polo HI$208,198 Executive Di $65,000 $58,177 2024
Urbansurf4kids CA$223,933 Executive Director $87,262 $75,327 2024
Southside Water Polo Club TX$224,949 Vice President $26,382 $26,382 2024
Friends Of Concord Crew NH$225,007 Director $28,900 $25,989 2025
Thresher Aquatics Inc FL$227,827 President $24,000 $24,156 2022
Blue Devil Swim Club IL$203,435 Director And Head Coach $38,107 $37,452 2024
North Aquatics Club Inc IL$201,540 President $1,270 $1,216 2025
Abilities At Windjammer Inc FL$231,446 President/ceo $38,173 $36,909 2023
Richfield Swim Club MN$232,064 Head Coach $65,289 $62,830 2025
Rowing Club Of The Woodlands Inc TX$233,348 Head Coach - Independent Contractor But Key To The Operations Of The Organization $29,000 $29,000 2024
Mid-hudson Aquatics Inc NY$234,361 President $28,500 $25,745 2024
Rocky Mt Rapids Swim Team CO$235,174 Head Coach $40,000 $38,343 2024
Mbu Water Polo Foundation CA$235,745 Executive Di $34,541 $30,697 2023
Chicago Training Center IL$236,029 Executive Director $70,000 $68,797 2024
Tampa Bay Aquatics Central Booster FL$238,903 Head Coah/officers $84,328 $77,153 2025

Comp (reported) is the figure on each organization's Form 990 (columns D + F); Comp (adjusted) normalizes it to TX cost of living and 2024 dollars. Click any organization to verify the figure on ProPublica.

Methodology

Comparable organizations were drawn from electronically filed IRS Form 990 returns and matched on sector (NTEE code), budget (a size-adaptive revenue band that tightens as the organization grows), and geography (same-state first, broadening only when too few peers qualify); every organization within the band forms the peer set. To compare fairly across regions and years, peer compensation is normalized to TX cost of living (BEA Regional Price Parities, 2023) and to the subject's filing year (CPI-U). The figure benchmarked is Form 990 Part VII, Section A, columns D + F — reportable pay plus other compensation, benefits, and deferred amounts (column F may include amounts from related organizations) — with the chief executive matched by role. Related-organization amounts (column E) and institutional trustees are excluded. Full methodology: peerbasis.org/methodology.

Sample, role match & sensitivity

Sensitivity — the subject's percentile under alternative compensation definitions:

BasisSubject percentile
Total compensation (D + F), cost-of-living + inflation adjusted — the PeerBasis default15th
Total compensation (D + F), as reported (no adjustments)13th
Reportable pay only (column D), adjusted19th
All sources (D + E + F), adjusted15th

If the percentile moves materially across these definitions, the result is sensitive to methodology choices, and the board should weigh which basis best fits its facts.

Rebuttable presumption of reasonableness · 26 CFR 53.4958-6

Compensation paid by a tax-exempt organization is presumed reasonable — shifting the burden to the IRS — when three requirements are met. This report supplies the comparability data for the second. The board should record the following in its minutes concurrently with its decision:

Draft board minutes — executive compensation

  1. The compensation of the Executive Director / CEO (Linda Chang) was approved in advance by [the Board / Compensation Committee], composed of members with no conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement.
  2. Prior to its determination, the authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate comparability data, namely the PeerBasis Compensation Comparability Determination dated June 9, 2026, comparing compensation against 78 similarly situated organizations (Same NTEE sector (N67), nationwide + budget 0.67–1.5× revenue).
  3. The authorized body determined that total compensation of $12,115 is reasonable (approximately the 15th percentile of comparable organizations) and documented the basis for this determination concurrently, on [date], by a vote of [__ for / __ against].

Sources: IRS Form 990 e-file data (apps.irs.gov); IRS Business Master File (NTEE classification). Every figure traces to an original public filing — click any organization above to verify it on ProPublica. PeerBasis is a service of Prismind Analytics; its methodology is published, was commissioned for independent adversarial review, and discloses its own limitations. This report is comparability data to support a board's good-faith determination under IRC 4958; it is not legal or tax advice. Generated by PeerBasis on June 9, 2026.